Crewe man jailed for breaching Sexual Harm Prevention Order
Teejay Walton sentenced to 30 months imprisonment
A 24-year-old man from Crewe has been sentenced to 30 months in prison for breaching his Sexual Harm Prevention Order (SHPO) and engaging in sexual communication with a child.
Teejay Walton, of Timbrell Avenue, was sentenced at Chester Crown Court on Thursday, 9th April 2026, after admitting to two breaches of his SHPO and one count of engaging in sexual communication with a child.
Walton was previously released from prison in December 2025 following another sexual conviction and was placed on the Sex Offenders Register along with a Sexual Harm Prevention Order until 2033.
The SHPO prohibited Walton from engaging with anyone under the age of 16 online and required him to maintain internet history on digital devices.
Between 22nd January and 27th January 2026, Walton used social media to converse with a 12-year-old, despite being informed of her age.
He altered his social media account settings to automatically delete messages, violating the terms of his SHPO.
Officers from the Sexual Offender Management Unit arrested Walton on Wednesday, 28th January 2026, at his Crewe residence.
While in custody, Walton admitted chatting with someone he assumed was under 16 and confessed to breaching his SHPO, claiming he was unaware that altering his social media settings was prohibited.
Police Constable Alex Barker, of the Sexual Offender Management Unit, said: “Teejay Walton flagrantly breached his Sexual Harm Prevention Order within a month of being released from prison, showing that he had clearly not learned his lesson.
“As a result of his multiple breaches, and his admission that he engaged in sexualised conversations with someone he knew to be under the age of consent, he has now been returned to prison where he is paying the price for his sickening behaviour.
“Officers from the Sexual Offender Management Unit regularly conduct visits to those on the Sex Offenders Register and those subject to Sexual Harm Prevention Orders to ensure breaches such as those committed by Walton do not occur, and to take appropriate action against those who choose to ignore the conditions imposed on them.”