Blackpool planning decision stalled over rock groynes controversy
Local authorities consult with RNLI on potential coastal solutions
Last updated 3rd Sep 2026
Blackpool Labour has opted to defer a decision on the installation of rock groynes along the local coastline following concerns raised by the RNLI.
The rock groynes proposal has stirred debate, with the council acknowledging that nobody desires rock groynes on the beaches.
However, after rigorous evaluation with specialist coastal engineers, consultants, and the Environment Agency, it has been recognised as the only viable option to protect properties from potential flooding.
Sand levels are decreasing, leading to exposure of the underlying soft boulder clay, which is rapidly eroding.
The council warns that without intervention, this erosion could endanger existing sea defences and increase risk for homes and businesses.
This initiative aims to safeguard the coastline and protect residential properties from the looming threat of coastal erosion and flooding.
Blackpool Labour intends to continue discussions with the RNLI to explore all possible mitigations and potential design adaptations to lower risks associated with rock groynes.
A Blackpool Council spokesperson said: “The Planning Committee has deferred a decision on the Blackpool Beach Management Scheme so that more time can be spent working with the RNLI on the scheme's safety measures.
"We are committed to working closely with the RNLI and other local partners to improve public safety along our coastline.
"The planning committee report recognised the work already undertaken to mitigate safety concerns and acknowledged that the council has taken its duty to protect the public seriously.
"The Blackpool Beach Management Scheme is vital for protecting more than 4,000 properties from flooding and coastal erosion, while helping to preserve Blackpool's sandy beaches for future generations.
"The scheme will also help protect vital economic infrastructure and support the long-term sustainability of Blackpool’s visitor economy.”